What was the focus of your work?
During my project, titled ‘Donor conception, secrecy, and the voice of the UK patients’, I explored four main areas:
- the governance of assisted conception regulations through online patient support networks;
- cross border reproductive care (CBRC) movements by the UK patients;
- ‘right to know’ in donor conception; and
- Turkish donor conception regulations.
Under the fellowship I built a strong track record of papers and book chapters. One of these books, ‘European Law and New Health Technologies’, has been selected to be part of the prestigious European Law series by Oxford University Press. A second book including my work, entitled Knowledge, Technology and Law, was published in Routledge’s series on Law, Science and Society. I have also published two papers in the leading socio-legal journals by invitation, and two book reviews.
During the fellowship, I sought to disseminate my work and ensure impact beyond the academy by engaging in public consultations within my field. For instance, I submitted a response to the Nuffield Council on Bioethics on mitochondria replacement therapy. I was invited to present evidence at the Nuffield Council on Bioethics’ donor conception fact-finding meeting held on 30 May 2012. On the invitation of British Federation of Women Graduates, on 29 September 2012, I presented a paper at Bioethics Study Day, to talk about the legal and ethical issues around egg donation for mitochondria research. As a result the Association submitted a response to the HFEA Consultation: Medical Frontiers. During the fellowship I built good research links with bioethicists, sociologists and lawyers who are engaged in socio-legal analysis of biomedical developments. I was a member of the Technoscience, Law and Society: Interrogating the Nexus AHRC Research Network which led to one of the book chapters. I have been invited to several universities as a speaker and presented my work at national and international conferences (including Switzerland, Denmark and the Netherlands). During the fellowship, I also developed two postdoctoral fellowship research proposals, which were both shortlisted.
What did the Mildred Blaxter fellowship offer you that you would not otherwise have been able to do?
I always say that career-wise, the Mildred Blaxter Fellowship was the best thing ever happened to me. Research associate posts that are available to new PhDs can be very demanding. If you take one of these posts following your PhD, and then move to another contract, and another contract, you may never find the time or desire to revisit your doctoral work. Working with other research leaders is very important and helpful, but it makes it difficult to establish yourself as an expert in your own area in which you invested 3-4 years during your doctoral work. The fellowship gave me a unique opportunity to focus on my own work, and the confidence to position myself as an expert in my field. It also looks very impressive in your CV as it shows the employers that you can work autonomously with little guidance and support!
What are you doing now?
I am a Lecturer in Law, Innovation, and Society at Newcastle Law School. This is a post which enables me to use insights from my interdisciplinary background in medical sociology, law, bioethics and science and technology studies.
Lecturer posts are very competitive and I believe that the employers want to recruit potential research leaders. They want to see an evidence of a research track, teaching and grant application experience, publications, and impact. Mildred Blaxter Postdoctoral Fellowship provided me with time and funding to merely concentrate on developing a strong research portfolio that could be attractive to the selection panels at universities.
What advice would you give to someone thinking of applying for a Mildred Blaxter fellowship?
The Mildred Blaxter Postdoctoral Fellowship is a fantastic opportunity to establish yourself as an early career researcher. I think the secret to success is to explain the funders that you have thought this through and decided what needs to be done during the next 12 months to create yourself a research track. Focus on your publication plans. State the expected outputs clearly. Your plans should be realistic, and if possible well-evidenced. For example, it helps if you are already invited to contribute a chapter in an edited book, or agreed to submit a paper to a special issue.
After the award…
Since 2018, Ilke has sat on the Executive Committee of Socio-Legal Research Association, where she also sits on the Grants Panel. In 2018, she was awarded a British Academy/Leverhulme Trust Small Grant, entitled ‘Sins of the mother: Socio-legal imaginaries of epigenetics’, which focuses on the ways in which the claims associated with epigenetics may give rise to legal claims. In 2019, she joined the Council of The North of England Medico-Legal Society, and the Health and Medical Humanities editorial board of Palgrave Communications.
After the award…
- Turkmendag, I. (2012) The donor-conceived child’s `right to personal identity’: the public debate on donor anonymity in the United Kingdom. Journal of Law and Society 39(1): 58-75.
- Turkmendag, I. (2012) Home and away: The Turkish ban on donor conception. Law, Innovation and Technology 4(2): 144-164.
- Haimes, E., K. Taylor and I. Turkmendag (2012) Eggs, ethics and exploitation? Investigating women’s experiences of an egg sharing scheme. Sociology of Health and Illness 34(8): 1199-1214.
- Turkmendag, I. (2012) Review of Sanal, A., ‘New Organs Within Us: Transplants and the Moral Economy (Experimental Futures)’. Duke University Press, 2011. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 7(1): 81-82.
- Turkmendag, I. (2012) Review of Banchoff, T., Embryo Politics: Ethics and Policy in Atlantic Democracies. Cornell University Press, 2011. Sociology of Health and Illness 34(4): 646-647.
- Haimes, E., K. Taylor, I. Turkmendag and S. Woods (2012) Response to the Nuffield Council on Bioethics Call for Evidence on: Emerging techniques to prevent inherited mitochondrial disorders: ethical issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
- Turkmendag, I. (2013) When sperm cannot travel: Experiences of UK would-be parents seeking treatment abroad. In M.L. Flear, A.M. Farrell, T.K. Hervey and T. Murphy (eds) European Law and New Health Technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Turkmendag, I. (2015) The voice of silence: UK patients’ silent resistance to the assisted reproduction regulations. In E. Cloatre and M. Pickersgill (eds) Knowledge, Technology and Law: At the Intersection of Socio-Legal and Science & Technology Studies. London: Routledge.